Skip to content

Gas Turbines - A Key Bottleneck, but for How Long?

The past few years have reshaped the global gas turbine market in ways few expected. As one of the pillars of global power generation, gas remains, alongside wind and solar, the only technology of meaningful scale still growing worldwide. What began as a steady recovery has become one of the most dramatic backlog extensions the industry has ever seen. Lead times for large turbines stretch into the 2030s, and pricing for the largest machines has increased by close to 300 percent. AI driven load growth, rising baseload requirements in the Middle East and Asia, and Europe’s ongoing need for dispatchable power have created a demand environment that overwhelms supply.

Today, the industry can supply roughly 50-60GW of gas turbines per year, while orders last year approached 88GW. Capacity expansions have been announced but may only take supply to around 100GW by 2030, or 120-125GW if we include aeroderivative turbines, gas engines and fuel cells. These estimates are uncertain, but the conclusion is clear; demand for the largest and most efficient machines cannot be met. As a result, many data centre developers unable to secure large turbines are installing less efficient reciprocating engines or small turbine systems as interim or stop-gap solutions.

A rapid build out is underway in these smaller turbine and engine segments to meet this demand. Anyone with a credible power solution is targeting the data centre market, especially in the US. This contrasts sharply with the market for large H-class turbines (300-400MW and above), where the supplier base is highly concentrated, visibility is better, and undersupply is likely to persist. Both markets cater to the same underlying demand, but they are fundamentally different in terms of product, competitive dynamics and ultimately where pricing power resides.

Understanding where pricing power sits is central to our investment process. We start with our top-down industry analysis, focusing on supply and demand and bottlenecks, before turning to bottom-up company analysis. We believe bottom-up analysis alone is rarely sufficient. Directional demand offers limited insight into cycle turning points within specific product categories unless the supply side is properly understood. This framework underpins our conviction in companies like Siemens Energy (ENR), even after nearly a 300% share price appreciation since our initial purchase.

The turbine market spans a wide spectrum. At one end are the large F and H class machines that in combined-cycle configuration can produce more than 800MW using waste heat via a steam turbine. These sit at the top of the technology stack and are dominated by three companies: Siemens Energy, GE Vernova and Mitsubishi. All three are expanding capacity, but at a measured pace and on increasingly attractive pricing, at least for now.

At the other end is a fast-growing ecosystem of smaller power solutions: small gas turbines, reciprocating engines, fuel cells, aero derivatives, hybrids and mobile generator sets. These are increasingly deployed “behind the meter” (BTM) by data centres waiting for grid connections, a topic we discussed in our October 2025 report “Bring your own power, how the data centre is rewiring the grid”. In this segment, barriers to entry are lower, engineering cycles shorter and systems modular enough to scale quickly.

Some examples, but the list is far from exhaustive:

  • Bloom Energy (BE), the global leader in fuel cells, is expanding manufacturing capacity to at least 2GW per year and positioning its technology directly against smaller turbines and engines, with the added benefit of higher efficiency and direct current output, which reduces the need for expensive transformers in future data centre architectures. Technology and scale create high barriers to entry versus new fuel cell competitors.
  • FTAI Aviation (FTAI), an aerospace company specialising in jet engine repair and leasing is repurposing existing CFM56 aircraft engines into 25MW aeroderivative units. It is targeting an expansion to around 100 units per year, equivalent to 2.5GW of annual supply in a few years.
  • Boom Supersonic, an engine maker for supersonic flight, is emerging with a containerized 42MW aeroderivative units and already received their first order for 29 units worth USD 1.25bn.
  • Baker Hughes (BKR), the oil service giant, is already an established player in this aeroderivative market, partly through its JV with GE Vernova.
  • Caterpillar (CAT), a major industrial gas turbine producer, plans to increase its turbine manufacturing capacity by roughly 2.5 times by 2030, with combined turbine and engine capacity expected to reach around 50GW of annual supply.
  • Wärtsilä (WRT1V), a large engine manufacturer, is increasing capacity by around 35 percent.
  • Some other notable participants that are also actively targeting data centres and have aggressive capacity expansion plans are: Cummins, Rolls-Royce, Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Man Energy.

Taken together, this ecosystem is becoming crowded, with existing players and new entrants all scaling aggressively to target the same BTM data centre market.

CAN DEMAND ABSORB ALL THIS SUPPLY?

Estimates for installed US data centre demand in 2030 vary widely from around 75GW (BNEF) to 130GW (BCG), up from roughly 45GW of installed capacity today. The more conservative estimates focus on interconnection queues and assume BTM solutions will remain a niche, given the complexity and cost of operating a parallel power system 24/7. We recognise these challenges, but given hyperscalers’ substantial capex commitments and the high value they place on time to power, we find it likely that BTM solutions will play a role, at least as interim capacity until large gas turbines and grid connections are available. We therefore run different scenarios for the share of new data centres going BTM and track developments closely, as this has important implications for the evolving supply picture.

For illustration, assume 15GW of BTM data centre capacity is added by 2030. Including 30% redundancy, this implies a total addressable market for smaller turbines, engines and fuel cells of roughly 4GW per year. Bloom Energy  (BE) alone could soon cover half of that, or more. Even if we double our BTM demand estimate, the capacity additions outlined above suggest that supply is likely to overwhelm demand for smaller power units, whether they are turbine or engines, by 2030.

It remains unclear whether these smaller solutions will become permanent power sources or primarily serve as stop gap measures until grid connections are secured. Our base case is that grid connection remains the preferred option wherever possible, which makes us cautious about taking too much exposure to this segment of the “Powering AI” market.

Instead, we prefer Siemens Energy (ENR) and its larger turbines, which are essential for grid build-out. The end markets are more diversified, in fact in 2025, only about 20-25% of large turbine orders were related to data centers.  With three players controlling an estimated 80-90% of this market, we foresee a longer-than-normal cycle for this highly profitable sub-segment of the gas turbine industry. We also like EPCs such as Mastec (MTZ), which should benefit from both grid expansion and from connecting BTM data centres to the gas network.

In our September-2025 report, “Are we in an AI bubble”, we wrote that “overbuilt infrastructure is historically rather a feature, not a bug of transformative infrastructure spending cycles.” Timing such a bubble is incredibly difficult but understanding the underlying cycles is less so.  That is why our investment process begins where it does; with understanding the cycle, the bottlenecks and the industry structure. This philosophy has guided our strategy for more than a decade. While we still prefer exposure to the larger turbines and believe this cycle has further to run, we are acutely aware that conditions in cyclical industries can change quickly, and we are continuously monitoring this dynamic.

Vidar Kalvoy

Portfolio manager

Vidar Kalvoy

Portfolio manager



  • Portfolio Manager and Founder of the Coeli Energy Opportunities Fund.
  • Has managed energy equities since 2006 and brings more than 20 years of experience in portfolio management and equity research.
  • Managed the Coeli Energy Transition Fund from 2019 to 2023.
  • Head of Energy Investments at Horizon Asset in London for nine years, a market-neutral hedge fund.
  • Experience from energy investments at MKM Longboat in London and equity research in the technology sector in Frankfurt and Oslo.
  • Holds an MBA from IESE in Barcelona and a Master’s in Business and Economics from the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH).
  • Before entering finance, he served as a lieutenant in the Royal Norwegian Navy.

Joel Etzler

Portfolio manager

Joel Etzler

Portfolio manager



  • Portfolio Manager and Founder of the Coeli Energy Opportunities Fund.
  • Over 15 years of investment experience spanning both public markets and private equity.
  • Managed the Coeli Energy Transition Fund from 2019 to 2023.
  • Spent six years at Horizon Asset in London, a market-neutral hedge fund.
  • Started working with Vidar Kalvoy in 2012.
  • Five years in Private Equity at Morgan Stanley.
  • Began his investment career in the technology sector at Swedbank Robur in Stockholm in 2006.
  • Holds an MSc in Engineering from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION. This is a marketing communication. Before making any final investment decisions, please refer to the prospectus of Coeli SICAV II, its Annual Report, and the KID of the relevant Sub-Fund. Relevant information documents are available in English at coeli.com. A summary of investor rights will be available at https://coeli.com/financial-and-legal-information/. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. The price of the investment may go up or down and an investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Please note that the management company of the fund may decide to terminate the arrangements made for the marketing of the fund in one or multiple jurisdictions in which there exists arrangements for marketing.

Please indicate whether you are a private or institutional investor.

Coeli may, pursuant to law, market one or multiple funds in several jurisdictions. By choosing an option in the list below, you confirm that you belong to one of these.

Den sammanfattande riskindikatorn ger en vägledning om risknivån för denna produkt jämfört med andra produkter. Den visar hur troligt det är att produkten kommer att sjunka i värde på grund av marknadsutvecklingen. Indikatorn speglar framför allt upp- och nedgångar i de aktier fonden placerat i. Denna produkt innehåller inte något skydd mot framtida marknadsresultat. Du kan därför förlora hela eller delar av din investering. Förutom de risker som ingår i riskindikatorn kan andra risker påverka fondens resultat. Se fondens fondbestämmelse för mer information.

Morningstars fondbetyg (rating) är ett mått som går att använda för att se hur fonderna har presterat historiskt. Fonden får ett högre betyg om den har haft en bra avkastning i förhållande till fondens risknivå. En fond måste ha funnits i minst 3 år för att få ett totalt betyg. Har fonden funnits längre än 5 och 10 år får dessutom betyg för dessa tidsperioder. Morningstars hållbarhetsbetyg är ett mått på de ekonomiskt väsentliga riskerna inom miljö, socialt och ägarfrågor (ESG) i en portfölj relativt till liknande konkurrerande portföljer. Hållbarhetsbetyget beräknas för fonder, förvaltningsuppdrag och index globalt, med hjälp av Morningstars databas med portföljinnehav.